Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  60 / 82 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 60 / 82 Next Page
Page Background

A D V A N C E D M A T E R I A L S & P R O C E S S E S | F E B R U A R Y / M A R C H 2 0 1 7

6 0

FEATURE

10

VACUUM FURNACES

The rapid spread of additive manufacturing is not its

only appeal, however, at least not for the heat treating indus-

try. As heat treaters are learning, AM work originates high in

the value chain and the majority of it has similar, although

challenging, processing requirements. Under such circum-

stances, a little knowledge, experience, and knowhow can

go a long way.

Most AM components being processed today have

complex geometries and are made to near net shape. This

makes them highly susceptible to defects caused by surface

contamination and thermally induced stress. Achieving the

necessary processing conditions requires a vacuum fur-

nace that can hold a vacuum somewhere between 10

-5

and

10

-6

Torr while maintaining a uniform temperature of ±2°F

throughout the heat zone (Fig. 3). In addition, heating and

cooling cycles as well as soaks must be tightly controlled to

prevent fractures and optimize part densities. This requires

unambiguous and accurate feedback that can be obtained

only fromdirect sensor contact with the part. Not all furnace

designs allow for that.

DESIGN PITFALLS

Besides having the right equipment and knowing how

to operate it, heat treaters must also know how to recog-

nize common design pitfalls that can doom a process from

the start. Any geometrically complex part with dissimilar

cross sections or non-radii surfaces, for example, will be

difficult to process, especially if liquid quenching alloys are

involved. The same goes for parts made fromnon-air-hard-

enable powder or wire because it compromises strength

and ductility due to crack susceptibility.

Another common but easily avoidable pitfall is the

use of mismatched build plates. Particularly for parts

made by direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) or electron

beam melting (EBM), all build plates should be as thick as

the thickest cross section being printed. Quite often, how-

ever, designers will print complex parts on extremely thick

backer plates in order to reuse the plates after sectioning

away the part. The thickness mismatch invariably causes

cracking and other defects in the printed part (Fig. 4).

Parts with unvented internal cavities represent

another common design oversight. Cooling passages and

cavities that are not properly ducted are subject to differ-

ential pressures during vacuum processing, often causing

them to deform or fracture. By the time such parts get to

heat treaters, it is usually too late to address the problem.

Another feature designers often forget to incorporate into

their designs is printed thermocouple holes in parts made

on DMLS or EBM systems (Fig. 5). Once the part is made,

it will be extremely difficult to heat treat because the only

accessible surface, the backer plate, is not thermally repre-

sentative of the co-joined, intricate printed parts.

Measuring and controlling temperature is critical to

the success of heat treating AM parts, and an area where

many process improvements originate. One especially

clever improvement harnesses the power of AM itself to

minimize temperature differences across fragile printed

Fig. 2 —

3Dprinters are becoming a common sight in CNC and tool

and die shops asmoremanufacturers embrace AM technology.

Fig. 3 —

Heat treaters have found an ally in vacuum furnaces

when it comes to processing intricate, near net shape AM parts.

Fig. 4 —

These cracks indicate that parts were formed on a base

plate too thick relative to the printed features.